Technical sciences
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62204/2336-498X-2023-1-16
DEFECTS IN THE ROAD SURFACE OF BRIDGES,
WHICH AFFECT THE NATURE OF THE MOVEMENT
OF MOTOR VEHICLES
Oleksandr Davydenko,
Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor,
National Transport University, Ukraine
oleksandr.davydenko@ntu.edu.ua; ORCID: 0000-0003-0176-3256
Oleksandr Razboinikov,
Candidate of Technical Sciences, Assistant Lecturer,
National Transport University, Ukraine
razboynikov.olexandr@ntu.edu.ua; ORCID: 0000-0003-3024-0999
Arsen Klochan,
Assistant Lecturer,
National Transport University, Ukraine
a.klochan@ntu.edu.ua; ORCID: 0000-0002-4225-9382
Annotation. The article conducts a study to identify typical pavement defects and their geometric parameters that affect the nature of vehicle traffic and lead to excessive dynamic loads on road bridges not provided for by the design.
Various research methods are used, including measurement of vehicle movement parameters, vehicle movement theory, diagnostics of bridge deck defects, and analysis of the impact of defects on automotive equipment. Accordingly, the results obtained in the article are based on the combination and analysis of information from specialists in road construction and automotive engineering. The results obtained can be used in mathematical modeling of the movement of vehicles over road bridges with defects and damage to the road surface.
Keywords: bridge, road surface, dynamic loads, defect, motor vehicles, typical pavement defects.
Introduction. The movement of a vehicle is determined by the combination of forces acting on it. Within certain limits, the driver can control the traction (during acceleration), braking (during braking), and transverse (during changing direction) forces on the wheels of the vehicle. However, there are forces that do not depend on the driver’s will (e.g., aerodynamic, dynamic forces acting between the vehicle wheel and a road surface defect, etc.).
Road surface defects lead to both forced oscillations of the vehicle and free oscillations that occur after they are overcome. Depending on the degree of road surface evenness, the level of vehicle oscillations (comfort); energy consumption for oscillations (efficiency); average speed (efficiency of use) and overhaul mileage (reliability) change [17]. At the same time, fluctuations in the sprung and unsprung masses of a vehicle will be accompanied by dynamic loads on the pavement both during and after overcoming its defect. This should be taken into account not only when studying the operational properties of a vehicle, but also when determining the dynamic load on the road surface, in particular, bridges. Given that the assurance of the reliability of road bridges is a strategically important task, all research in this area is relevant. To conduct such studies, it is necessary to identify typical pavement defects and their geometric parameters that affect the nature of vehicle traffic and lead to dynamic loads on the bridge.
A highway bridge is a building structure consisting of seven groups of elements according to DSTU 9181:2022 “Guidelines for assessment and forecasting of the technical condition of highway bridges”. Only three groups of elements – foundations, piers, and spans – are crucial and affect the bearing capacity. The bridge deck, in turn, consists of the following elements: roadway pavement, waterproofing, safety barriers, curbstones, surface drainage system from the bridge roadway, sidewalks and their pavement, railings, and expansion joints. In general, the bridge deck has several main tasks:
- Protection of the bridge bearing elements from road traffic and aggressive environment during operation.
- Ensuring smooth and safe movement of vehicles and pedestrians.
Accordingly, in case of defects and damage to the bridge deck elements, the main tasks are not met, which in turn significantly affects the reliability, durability and reduction of traffic safety. In case of violation of the longitudinal and transverse profiles on the approaches to the bridge and the structure itself, the smoothness of traffic disappears and additional dynamic loads appear in the bridge abutment and on the structure as a whole [4]. The combination of defects in the bridge deck elements, i.e., its technical condition, directly affects the deterioration of the bridge bearing elements due to the increase in dynamic impacts created by the vehicle suspension elements and the wheel itself when overcoming defects.
Objective of the study. The purpose of the study is to determine typical pavement defects and their geometric parameters that affect the nature of vehicle traffic and lead to dynamic loads on the bridge.
The following tasks were set and achieved in the course of the research:
- To review the literature on the classification of defects in roads and highway bridges, as well as their impact on vehicle traffic and the formation of the most common deformations.
- To conduct a study on the classification of defects and damage to bridge deck elements that affect the nature of vehicle traffic and lead to dynamic loads on the bridge.
- To analyze the movement of a vehicle while overcoming defects and damage to the roadway of road bridges.
Literature review. Paper [22] proposes the use of YOLO (You Only Look Once) neural networks and high- and low-resolution images to detect defects in the span structures and piers of reinforced concrete bridges. The approach proposed in this paper can be used for rapid real-time detection of bridge defects. The following types of defects are considered in this paper: concrete surface cracking, reinforcement exposure, and corrosion.
Paper [24] addresses the issue of defect recognition using visual inspection methods and deep learning neural networks by identifying the bounding box of each defect. The proposed approach cannot be used to obtain the geometric properties of each individual defect. This paper also considers defects in reinforced concrete structures of bridge spans and piers, namely: cracks, splitting, exposed reinforcement, patching, and abrasion areas. These defects reduce the structural capacity and durability of concrete, as well as the overall safety and serviceability of concrete structures.
Paper [7] is devoted to the scientometric and systematic analysis of modern research related to the assessment of defects in reinforced concrete bridges using non-destructive testing methods. The paper considers surface and subsurface anomalies in reinforced concrete bridges as defects.
Paper [12] presents the results of a systematic review of automated approaches and tools, including computer vision methods, for detecting road defects and anomalies, as well as their impact on road safety. Among the main types of defects considered in this paper are the following: potholes, cracks, delamination, cracking, shrinkage and swelling of road layers, and others. The researchers consider the problem of defects and damage to the bridge deck from the point of view of road and pedestrian safety and provide the following classification (Fig. 1).
|
Fig. 1. Types and sub-types of on-road hazard categories in the context of anomaly and defect detection using computer vision [12] Paper [14] discusses the peculiarities of road structures in the area of bridge and bridge approach junction, as well as the main types of defects in the pavement of bridges and bridge approaches. The author considers the following defects in the pavement of bridges and bridge approaches: approach soil settlement, asphalt concrete pavement cracks, soil erosion, water leakage. These types of defects reduce the reliability and durability of asphalt pavement at bridge crossings and can cause the emergence of the “key effect” hazard. Article [15] discusses the issue of designing the pavement structure considering the specifics of oversized and heavy transportation. A special aspect in addressing this issue is to consider the strength and bearing capacity of bridges and road structures and the selection of appropriate specialized rolling stock. The paper considers the following types of pavement defects: grid cracks, potholes, longitudinal cracks, transverse cracks, block cracks, cement concrete slab breaks, peeling, chipping, sinking, crumbling, and others. In [3], the authors determine the cost of 1 m2 of each type of bridge repair, which can be used in the financial and economic module of the Analytical Expert Bridge Management System. The study proposes an expert distribution of defects depending on their impact on the technical condition of structures or the structure as a whole: 1. Unacceptable. 2. Limitedly permissible. 3. Acceptable. Note that this expert distribution of defects applies to all seven groups of bridge elements. In their scientific work [3], the authors consider the adequacy of the existing methodology for assessing the levelness of roads at bridge crossings and note that defects in artificial highway structures significantly affect the comfort and safety of traffic. In their conclusions, they note that the existing methodology for assessing the smoothness of roads does not provide for the allocation of areas where artificial structures are located, since the assessment of the smoothness of the pavement is performed on a kilometer-by-kilometer basis, so bridge crossings are left unattended. The Road Disease Manual developed with the support of USAID [22] considers the following factors that cause the most common deformations and destruction of road structures: operational, climatic, construction and design factors, as well as the impact of the vehicle on the formation of the most common deformations and destruction of road structures. It is noted that the most significant impact of these factors is the vertical impact of the vehicle, untimely repairs, and shortcomings in the design and construction of the road structure. The paper identifies the following types of deformation and destruction of road pavements: formation of potholes, loss of strength, subsidence, crack network, peeling, crumbling, edge destruction, individual cracks, rutting, potholes. Bridge crossings are not considered separately in the manual. The main part. Road surface defects are characterized by the shape of the profile (harmonic, parabolic, rectangular, etc.), its dimensions (length, height), and its location. From the point of view of the theory of vehicle movement, road surface irregularities are usually classified depending on their impact on the vehicle. There are macro-profile bumps (wavelength – 100 m and more), micro-profile bumps (wavelength – 10 cm to 100 m) and pavement roughness (wavelength – less than 10 cm) [2]. It is noted that the former and the latter have almost no effect on the process of vehicle oscillation (macro-profile irregularities significantly affect only the operation of the engine and transmission (Fig. 2a), and roughness is absorbed by the tires (Fig. 2b) [2]) [17]. (a) (b) Fig. 2. Characteristics of the car’s overcoming the macro-profile bump (a) and absorption of the bump by its pneumatic tire (b) [21] Professor A.P. Soltus emphasizes [20], that the microprofile of the bearing surface is one of the most significant factors that leads to the emergence of dynamic reactions in the contact of the wheel with the bearing surface. In addition, the microprofile directly affects the process of oscillation of the vehicle [21]. Thus, Figure 2 shows the nature of the change in the position of the center of the wheel (unsprung mass) of the vehicle and its characteristic point on the body (sprung mass). The positions of these points before the beginning of overcoming the pavement defect of the bridge crossing expansion joint are shown in Fig. 3а. The change in the position of these points during the overcoming of the negative (Fig. 3b) and positive (Fig. 3c) angles of attack [17] of the pavement defect is also shown. Fig. 3c shows a significant decrease in the distance between the suspended and unsprung masses of the vehicle, as well as an increase in the deformation of its tire. This indicates an increase in the dynamic forces acting both in its suspension and in the contact patch between the car wheel and the road surface of the bridge crossing. Taking into account that these phenomena most significantly affect the nature of vehicle movement, which leads to dynamic loads on the bridge crossing, we further consider the irregularities of the microprofile. The microprofile consists of bumps (bump spacing ranges from 0.1 m to 100 m [2]). In this case, irregularities up to 1 cm in height with a length not exceeding the length of the tire’s footprint are usually called roughness. The minimum length of a micro-profile bump is taken from 0.2 m to 0.4 m. Y. M. Pevzner notes that the most intense fluctuations of the unsprung masses of the vehicle and fluctuations in the dynamic reactions between the wheel and the road are observed on bumps with a wavelength of 1 m to 2 m when driving at average operating speeds. With an increase in vehicle weight and bump height, the normal reactions of the uneven bearing surface increase [17]. At the same time, an increase in the angle of attack of a road bump leads to a decrease in the coefficient of stability of the vehicle against skidding [20]. Fig. 3. Influence of micro-profile irregularities on the vehicle’s movement pattern In view of the above, it can be concluded that the main influence on the nature of vehicle traffic, which leads to additional dynamic loads on the bridge, is exerted by road surface defects, which, by their geometric parameters, belong to the microprofile, i.e., the length of the roadway defects is larger than the tire imprint. It is worth noting that [8] analyzes the disturbing effect of road irregularities on a vehicle. The author emphasizes that wave-like sections of asphalt roads have an intense disturbing effect. Measurements and static processing of such sections showed that the most common wavelengths are from 1.5 m to 4.5 m. At the same time, harmonic irregularities can be single, both with a negative height (potholes whose sharp edges are smoothed out by the wheels of vehicles) and with a positive height (for example, protrusions in the area of manholes (Fig. 4a) [13]) [17]. The harmonic bump profile is often chosen (in accordance with the standardized methodology for calculating the smoothness of a car’s ride) when studying the interaction of a car wheel with an uneven road surface [1, 2, 5, 6, 9, 11, 13, 17, 18, 23]. The profile characteristic of a harmonic bump (Fig. 4a) allows the tire contact patch to be considered as a plane that changes its height and inclination relative to the horizon (bump attack angle). This greatly simplifies the mathematical modeling of the processes that occur when an elastic tire interacts with an uneven road surface (Fig. 4b) [17]. It should be noted that from the point of view of the micro profile and its impact on the nature of vehicle movement (Fig. 3), a characteristic defect of the pavement of bridge crossings occurs in the area of expansion joints (Fig. 3, Fig. 5). Fig. 4. Photo of a road surface defect with a harmonic profile (а) [13] and visualization of mathematical modeling of its overcoming by a car (b) [17] Fig. 5. Characteristic defects of bridge pavement in the area of expansion joints From the analysis of Figures 3 and 4, it can be seen that from the point of view of mathematical modeling of the interaction of a car wheel with a bearing surface, defects in the pavement of bridge crossings in the area of expansion joints, as well as potholes, the sharp edges of which are smoothed out by the wheels of vehicles on the one hand and absorbed by the pneumatic tire on the other (Fig. 1b), can be considered as bumps of a harmonic profile with a negative height. Conclusions. 1. A literature review has shown that most studies [7, 12, 22, 24] are aimed at fixing and detecting defects in the bearing elements of reinforced concrete road bridges using modern monitoring technologies, such as high-resolution cameras, neural networks, and artificial intelligence. Scientific works that consider defects and damage to roadway elements of road bridges [3, 14, 15, 19] are aimed at solving the problem of road and pedestrian safety, as well as planning the time and cost of repairs. 2. From the point of view of the theory of car movement, the unevenness of the bearing surface is classified depending on their impact on the car. There are macro-profile, micro-profile and pavement roughness irregularities. The microprofile directly affects the process of oscillation of the vehicle and leads to the appearance of dynamic loads acting in the contact of the car wheel with the road surface. 3. The main influence on the nature of vehicle movement, which leads to dynamic loads on the bridge crossing, is exerted by road surface defects, which by their geometric parameters belong to the microprofile (wavelength – from 10 cm to 100 m). The most intense fluctuations in the unsprung mass of the vehicle and fluctuations in the dynamic reactions between the wheel and the road are observed on bumps with a wavelength of 1 m to 2 m when driving at average operating speeds. The harmonic bump profile is often chosen (in accordance with the standardized methodology for calculating the smoothness of a vehicle) when studying the interaction of a vehicle wheel with an uneven road surface. The profile characteristic of a harmonic bump makes it possible to treat the bearing surface of the bump as a plane that changes its height and inclination relative to the horizon in the area of the tire contact patch. This greatly simplifies the mathematical modeling of the processes that occur when an elastic tire interacts with an uneven road surface. From the point of view of the micro-profile and its impact on the nature of vehicle movement, a characteristic defect of the bridge pavement occurs in the area of expansion joints, which, from the point of view of mathematical modeling of the interaction of a car wheel with the bearing surface, as well as potholes, the sharp edges of which are smoothed out under the action of vehicle wheels on the one hand and absorbed by the pneumatic tire on the other, can be considered as bumps of a harmonic profile with a negative height. Acknowledgement Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Research Foundation of Ukraine under award number 2022.01/0142 “Development of a load model based on the actual parameters of heavy rolling stock to determine the carrying capacity of road bridges during their restoration and operation in the war and post-war periods”. References: 1. Blundell M., Harty D. The Multibody Systems Approach to Vehicle Dynamics : 2nd edition. Oxford : Butterworth-Heinemann, 2015. 756 p. 2. Bohomolov V.O. Modeliuvannia dorozhnoi poverkhni dlia rozrakhunku dynamiky rukhu transportnykh zasobiv / V.O. Bohomolov, V.I. Klymenko, AL. IIIylov. R.V. Alekseiev // Avtomobilnyi transport. – 2011. – Vyp. 29. – S. 37-42. [Ukrainian] 3. Bondar L., Stepanov S. Vyznachennia prohnozovanoi vartosti provedennia remontiv mostiv z vykorystanniam analitychnoi ekspertnoi systemy upravlinnia mostamy. Dorohy i mosty. 2016. № 16. S. 28–35. URL: http://dorogimosti.org.ua/files/upload/ЗБІРНИК_16.pdf (data zvernennia: 05.10.2023). [Ukrainian] 4. Davydenko O. Topical problems of elements of bridge crossing abutments and adjacent approaches. Mizhnarodna konferentsiia «Vprovadzhennia innovatsiinykh materialiv i tekhnolohii pry proiektuvanni, budivnytstvi ta ekspluatatsii obiektiv transportnoi infrastruktury v ramkakh prohramy «Velyke budivnytstvo». 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.33744/978-966-632-317-3-2022-2-16-20 (date of access: 13.10.2023). 5. Dixon J. C. Suspension geometry and computation. Chichester: Wiley, 2009. 434 р. 6. Ekspluatatsiini vlastyvosti avtotransportnykh zasobiv. V 3 ch. Ch. 2. Plavnist khodu ta prokhidnist avtotransportnykh zasobiv : navchalnyi posibnyk / V. P. Sakhno, V. M. Poliakov, A. V. Kostenko ta in. Donetsk : LANDON-KhKhI, 2014. 354 s. 7. Eslam, Z. Tarek та F. Nour, “Synthesized Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Defects, Their Non-Destructive Inspection and Analysis Methods: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis of the Past Three Decades”, Buildings, t. 13, № 3, 2023, st. № 800. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13030800 8. Hordieiev V. N. Statystychne doslidzhennia oburiuvalnykh vplyviv vid nerivnostei shliakhu na transportni zasoby, shcho rukhaiutsia: dys. … kand. tekhn. nauk: 01.02.06 / Dnipropetrovsk, 1973. 126 s. [Ukrainian] 9. Jazar R. N. Vehicle Dynamics: Theory and Application. New York: Springer, 2008. 1015 p. 10. Klets D. M. Otsinka stiikosti avtombiliu proty zanesennia pry rusi nerivnoiu dorohoiu. Visnyk NTU “KhPI”. 2013. № 30 (1003). P. 55-61 [Ukrainian] 11. Klets D.M. Vyznachennia normalnykh reaktsii na perednikh ta zadnikh kolesakh avtomobilia pid chas rukhu nerivnoiu dorohoiu. Visnyk KhNADU. 2013. Vyp. 61–62. P. 195-199 [Ukrainian] 12. M. Rathee, B. Bačić та M. Doborjeh, “Automated Road Defect and Anomaly Detection for Traffic Safety: A Systematic Review”, Sensors, т. 23, № 12, 2023, ст. № 5656. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23125656 13. Mitschke Manfred, Wallentowitz Henring. Dynamik der Kraftfahrzeuge. Berlin: Springer, 2014. 919 p. 14. O. V. Kushnir, “Zabezpechennia dovhovichnosti dorozhnohoodiahu na pidkhodakh”, Avtomob. dorohy i dorozh. bud-vo, № 107, s. 63–70, 2020. http://publications.ntu.edu.ua/avtodorogi_i_stroitelstvo/107/63.pdf [Ukrainian] 15. O. V. Kushnir, I. P. Gamelyak, V. F. Raikovsky та U. M. Klimov, “Designing of a design of road clothes for transportation of large and especially heavy loads by roads of Ukraine”, Sci. Educ. New Dimension, т. VIII(244), № 30, с. 53–62, груд. 2020. https://doi.org/10.31174/send-nt2020-244viii30-13 [Ukrainian] 16. Posibnyk dorozhnikh “khvorob”. Kyiv, 2019. 198 p. URL: https://zakon.help/files/article/10842/ПОСІБНИК%20ДОРОЖНІХ%20_ХВОРОБ_.pdf (data zvernennia: 05.10.2023). 17. Razboinikov O. O. Polipshennia kursovoi stiikosti lehkovoho avtomobilia pry rusi po nerivnii dorozi : dys. … kand. tekhn. nauk : 05.22.02 / Razboinikov Oleksandr Oleksandrovych. – Kyiv : NTU, 2021. – 214 p. [Ukrainian] 18. Rill G. Road Vehicle Dynamics : Fundamentals and Modeling. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2012. 331 p. 19. Smolianiuk R., Smolianiuk N., Shtefan O. Vyznachennia rivnosti dorozhnoho pokryttia na shtuchnykh sporudakh. Avtomobilni dorohy i dorozhnie budivnytstvo. 2017. № 99. S. 98–105. 20. Soltus A. P. Osnovy teorii robochoho protsesu ta rozrakhunku keruiuchykh kolisnykh moduliv: avtoref. dys. … d-ra. tekhn. nauk: 05.22.02. Kyiv, 1995. 43 p. [Ukrainian] 21. Soltus A. P. Teoriia ekspluatatsiinykh vlastyvostei avtomobilia: navchalnyi posibnyk dlia VNZ. Kyiv : Aristei, 2010. 155 s. [Ukrainian] 22. T. Shuai, L. Zongchao та L. Xiaoda, “Improved YOLOv3-Based Bridge Surface Defect Detection by Combining High- and Low-Resolution Feature Images”, Buildings, т. 12, № 8, 2022, ст. № 1225. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12081225 URL: http://publications.ntu.edu.ua/avtodorogi_i_stroitelstvo/99/098-105.pdf (data zvernennia: 05.10.2023). [Ukrainian] 23. Wolfgang Matschinsky. Radführungen der Straßenfahrzeuge : Kinematik, Elasto-Kinematik und Konstruktion. München : Springer, 2007. 470 p. 24. Z. Chaobo, C. Chih-Chen та J. Maziar, “Simultaneous pixel-level concrete defect detection and grouping using a fully convolutional model”, Structural Health Monit., т. 20, № 4, с. 2199–2215, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921720985437
|
|
|